Bill Details
SRES.136 - 119th Congress
Status
Latest action
2025-03-25 - Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1837-1838)
Introduced Date
2025-03-25
Policy Area
Law
Committees
View committees (1)
Sponsors
Cosponsors
View cosponsors (16)
- Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-New York]
- Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-Hawaii]
- Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-Colorado]
- Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-Delaware]
- Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-Rhode Island]
- Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-Minnesota]
- Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-Illinois]
- Sen. Welch, Peter [D-Vermont]
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-California]
- Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-Oregon]
- Sen. Ossoff, Jon [D-Georgia]
- Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-Connecticut]
- Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-New Hampshire]
- Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-Arizona]
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-New Jersey]
- Sen. Heinrich, Martin [D-New Mexico]
7
0
0
Official Summaries
No summaries available
Current Full Text
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 136
Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 25, 2025
Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Hickenlooper, Mr.
Coons, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Welch, Mr.
Padilla, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Ossoff, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Shaheen, and Mr.
Kelly) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.
Resolved, That the Senate affirms that--
(1) Article III of the Constitution of the United States
vests the ``judicial Power of the United States . . . in one
supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may
from time to time ordain and establish'';
(2) as Chief Justice Marshall held in the Supreme Court's
landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. Madison, ``It is emphatically
the province and duty of the judicial department to say what
the law is'';
(3) the Constitution of the United States and established
precedent require the executive branch to comply with all
Federal court rulings; and
(4) if the executive branch disagrees with a ruling by a
Federal court, it may appeal that ruling when authorized by
law.
<all>