Bill Details
S.644 - 119th Congress
Status
Latest action
2025-02-20 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Introduced Date
2025-02-20
Policy Area
Government Operations and Politics
Committees
View committees (1)
Sponsors
Cosponsors
View cosponsors (1)
8
0
0
AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.
This bill would push federal agencies to do a better job of reviewing their older rules and regulations after they have been put in place. It asks the government to use modern technology, including computer tools and artificial intelligence, to find rules that are outdated, confusing, too costly, redundant, or contain mistakes. It also requires agencies to make progress toward putting regulations into a machine-readable format so they are easier to search and analyze. In short, the bill is meant to help the government clean up its rules, spot problems faster, and make future reviews more efficient and accurate.
- Within 180 days, the Office of Management and Budget must report to Congress on how well federal regulations are being made available in machine-readable form.
- That report must also address whether the online Code of Federal Regulations is being recognized as an official legal edition.
- Within 18 months, the Office of Management and Budget must issue guidance on how agencies can use technology, including artificial intelligence, to review regulations more efficiently and find rules that are outdated, overly burdensome, conflicting, or incorrect.
- Within 2 years, each agency must send Congress and the Office of Management and Budget a plan for carrying out this guidance, and then begin using that plan within 180 days after it is submitted.
Official Summaries
No summaries available
Current Full Text
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 644 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 644
To improve retrospective reviews of Federal regulations, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 20, 2025
Mr. Lee (for himself and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To improve retrospective reviews of Federal regulations, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory
Review Act''.
SEC. 2. IMPROVING RETROSPECTIVE REVIEWS OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Administrative committee of the federal register.--The
term ``Administrative Committee of the Federal Register'' means
the committee established under section 1506 of title 44,
United States Code.
(2) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs.
(3) Agency.--The term ``agency'' has the meaning given the
term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.
(4) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform of the House of Representatives; and
(B) the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
(5) Director of gpo.--The term ``Director of GPO'' means
the Director of the Government Publishing Office.
(6) Machine-readable.--The term ``machine-readable'' has
the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United
States Code.
(7) Retrospective review of a regulation of the agency.--
The term ``retrospective review of a regulation of the agency''
means a review of regulations of the agency conducted after the
regulation has been issued that is required by law or
determined appropriate by the head of the agency.
(b) Report on Availability of Existing Regulations in Machine-
Readable Format.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget, acting through the Administrator and in
consultation with the Director of GPO, the Archivist of the
United States, and the Director of the Federal Register, shall
submit to the appropriate congressional committees, a report on
the progress of the Federal Government in making regulations of
agencies available in machine-readable format.
(2) Contents of report.--The report required by paragraph
(1) shall include--
(A) an assessment of whether agency regulations
have been made available in a machine-readable format
to the public; and
(B) information regarding the recognition by the
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register of the
eCFR maintained by the Director of the Federal Register
and the Director of GPO as an official legal edition of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
(c) Guidance on Using Technology to Conduct Retrospective
Reviews.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget, acting through the Administrator, shall issue
guidance on how the head of an agency can--
(A) use technology (including algorithmic tools and
artificial intelligence) to more efficiently, cost-
effectively, and accurately conduct any retrospective
review of the existing regulations of the agency,
including how to identify, procure, and use such
technology to identify through any such review
regulations of the agency that--
(i) are obsolete, ineffective, or
insufficient;
(ii) are excessively burdensome or should
be improved;
(iii) contain typographical errors;
(iv) contain inaccurate cross references;
or
(v) are redundant, contradict, or overlap
with any regulations or standards of the
agency; and
(B) adequately train personnel of the agency on how
to use such technology.
(2) Development of guidance.--In developing the guidance
required pursuant to paragraph (1), the Administrator shall
take into account any assessment or information included in the
report required by subsection (b).
(d) Agency Retrospective Review Plan.--Not later than 2 years after
the date of enactment of this Act, the head of each agency shall submit
to the Administrator and the appropriate congressional committees a
plan that--
(1) includes a detailed strategy for implementing the
guidance issued pursuant to subsection (c) with respect to the
regulations of the agency;
(2) identifies any regulation of the agency, or categories
of regulations of the agency, that the head of the agency--
(A) is required by law to review after the
applicable regulation is issued; or
(B) determines would benefit from being reviewed
after the regulation is issued; and
(3) includes any additional information, data, or ex-post
analysis determined necessary or useful by the head of the
agency.
(e) Agency Implementation.--Not later than 180 days after the date
on which the head of an agency submits the plan required by subsection
(d), the head of the agency shall implement the strategy included in
such plan with respect to any retrospective review of a regulation of
the agency.
<all>