Bill Details

HR.890 - 119th Congress

Track Stopping Pharma’s Ripoffs and Drug Savings For All Act? Stop tracking Stopping Pharma’s Ripoffs and Drug Savings For All Act?

When you track this bill you will receive emails when the bill has been updated.

You will no longer receive emails when this bill is updated.

Status
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. To President
  5. Law
Latest action
2025-01-31 - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced Date
2025-01-31
Policy Area
Commerce
Committees
View committees (1)
7
0

AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.

This bill would change patent rules for certain medicines and biological products to help stop companies from using closely related patents to extend exclusive rights beyond the first patent’s end date. In patent disputes over drugs and biologics, later patents tied to the same product would generally be treated as if their term after the first patent expires has been given up, unless the patent owner can show those later patents cover truly different inventions. The bill would also require the Patent Office to review how it examines these patent applications and to report its findings to Congress, with the goal of reducing patents that unfairly stretch out drug exclusivity and delay lower-cost alternatives.

  • In many drug and biologic patent disputes, later patents would be presumed not to add extra time beyond the first patent that expires.
  • A patent owner could avoid that presumption by showing, with enough evidence, that the later patents are actually for distinct inventions.
  • Any patent term extensions already granted by the Patent Office would still be honored if the patents are found to be distinct.
  • The Patent Office would have to review its patent examination methods and, within one year, send Congress a report with its findings and any recommended changes.

Official Summaries

Stopping Pharma’s Ripoffs and Drug Savings For All Act

This bill addresses double patenting with respect to drug-related patents. Specifically, the bill requires an owner of drug-related patents, if the owner lists more than one patent as covering a particular drug, to prove in certain proceedings that each patent covers a distinct invention. If the patent owner fails to do so, then the owner shall have disclaimed patent protection from all the listed patents after the first patent expires.

This requirement shall apply to various proceedings challenging the validity of drug-related patents, as well as to infringement lawsuits filed by the patent owner against companies seeking Food and Drug Administration approval for generic or biosimilar versions of patented drugs.

The bill also directs the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to review its examination procedures to prevent granting multiple patents for the same drug or biological product, unless the patents cover distinct inventions. The USPTO shall report to Congress its findings and recommendations from the review.

Current Full Text

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 890 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 890

To amend title 35, United States Code, to prevent double patenting, and 
                          for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2025

   Mr. Ryan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend title 35, United States Code, to prevent double patenting, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Pharma's Ripoffs and Drug 
Savings For All Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF DOUBLE PATENTING.

    (a) In General.--Section 253 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Disclaimers of Drug Patent Term.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), in 
        a proceeding challenging the validity of patents under section 
        505(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
        355(c)) with respect to a drug, under section 351(l) of the 
        Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(l)) with respect to a 
        biological product, or a Federal district court proceeding 
        involving patents that are the subject of an action under 
        section 271(e)(2), the patentee shall be presumed to have 
        disclaimed the patent term for each of the listed patents after 
        the date on which the term of the first patent expires, subject 
        to the exceptions provided for in subsection (2).
            ``(2) Demonstration of distinct inventions.--If a patentee 
        demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that certain 
        patents described in paragraph (1) cover patentably distinct 
        inventions from the invention claimed in the first such patent 
        to expire, no part of the term of any such patent shall be 
        presumed to have been disclaimed, and all patent term 
        extensions granted by the United States Patent and Trademark 
        Office shall be respected, unless and to the extent the 
        patentee expressly disclaims, in writing, the patent term for 
        each such patent.''.
    (b) USPTO Review.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
                    (A) the term ``Office'' means the United States 
                Patent and Trademark Office; and
                    (B) the term ``Director'' means the Under Secretary 
                of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
                the Office.
            (2) Review.--The Director shall conduct a comprehensive 
        review of the patent examination procedures of the Office to 
        determine whether the Office--
                    (A) is using best examination practices, guidance, 
                and procedures to avoid the issuance of patents 
                relating to the same drug, or biological product, that 
                are not patentably distinct from one another, and not 
                subject to an appropriate disclaimer of patent term; 
                and
                    (B) should develop and implement new practices, 
                guidance, or procedures to--
                            (i) improve examination of patent 
                        applications relating to the same drug or 
                        biological product; and
                            (ii) reduce the improper issuance of 
                        patents that improperly extend the term of 
                        exclusivity afforded a new drug or biological 
                        product.
            (3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the 
        Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a 
        report that contains--
                    (A) the findings from the review conducted under 
                paragraph (2); and
                    (B) any recommendations of the Director with 
                respect to the review conducted under paragraph (2).
                                 <all>