Bill Details
View committees (1)
View cosponsors (15)
- Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-South Dakota]
- Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [R-Nevada-2]
- Rep. Owens, Burgess [R-Utah-4]
- Rep. Jacobs, Sara [D-California-51]
- Rep. Smucker, Lloyd [R-Pennsylvania-11]
- Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-Illinois-10]
- Rep. Harris, Andy [R-Maryland-1]
- Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-Louisiana-2]
- Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-Utah-1]
- Rep. Williams, Roger [R-Texas-25]
- Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-Oklahoma-3]
- Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-New York-17]
- Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-New York-11]
- Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-California-14]
- Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-Florida-4]
AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.
This bill makes small changes to an existing law about cultural property imports so it is easier to legally trade and collect coins and other money-related collectibles. It says what counts as “numismatic material,” and it sets clearer rules for bringing these items into the United States. In general, the bill is meant to help honest collectors and dealers prove their items were obtained and exported legally, while still giving customs officials tools to stop illegal material from coming in.
It defines “numismatic material” to include coins, tokens, paper money, medals, and related items.
For these items to pass import review, the importer must show they were bought legally, are a known type, and are not known to have come directly from illegal digging in another country.
The bill says a sworn statement from the importer can be enough to show the item was lawfully acquired and exported, is a type that exists in multiple examples, and is not known to be from an illegal excavation.
Customs officers may not ask for extra documents or statements unless there is probable cause, based on documentary evidence, to think the information is false or fraudulent.
Official Summaries
This bill revises the standard for providing satisfactory evidence to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding the importation of numismatic material (i.e., coins, tokens, paper money, medals, and related objects) into the United States.
Current law generally prohibits the importation of designated archaeological or ethnological material that is exported from certain countries that are a party to the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Importation is allowed if the country issues a certification or other documentation certifying the exportation was not in violation of the country's laws. The United States implements its obligations through the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act.
Under current law, CBP must seize imports of designated archaeological or ethnological material unless the importer establishes by certain documentation or satisfactory evidence that the material is admissible into the United States.
This bill specifies the standard for satisfactory evidence with respect to numismatic material. Specifically, the bill allows for the import of numismatic material with evidence that the numismatic material was acquired and exported lawfully, is of a known type, and is not known to be the direct product of illicit excavations within certain countries after the effective date for any import restrictions on such material.
The bill prohibits CBP, when reviewing satisfactory evidence, from requiring other documentation unless there is probable cause to believe the presented evidence is false or fraudulent.
Current Full Text
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 595 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 595
To amend the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act to make
certain technical corrections to facilitate the lawful trade and
collecting of numismatic materials.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 21, 2025
Ms. Van Duyne (for herself, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Amodei of
Nevada, Mr. Owens, and Ms. Jacobs) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act to make
certain technical corrections to facilitate the lawful trade and
collecting of numismatic materials.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO CONVENTION ON CULTURAL PROPERTY IMPLEMENTATION
ACT.
(a) Definitions.--Section 302 of the Convention on Cultural
Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (8), (9), (10), and (11) as
paragraphs (9), (10), (11), and (12), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
``(8) The term `numismatic material' includes coins,
tokens, paper money, medals and related objects.''.
(b) Import Restrictions.--Section 307 of the Convention on Cultural
Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2606) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``; or'' at the
end and inserting a comma;
(B) in paragraph (2)(B), by adding ``or''at the
end; and
(C) by inserting after paragraph (2)(B) (as
amended) the following:
``(3) in the case of such material that is numismatic
material, satisfactory evidence that the material was acquired
lawfully, is of a known type, and is not known to be the direct
product of illicit excavations within a State Party,'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) for purposes of subsection (b)(3), one or more
declarations under oath by the importer or the person for whose
account the material is imported, stating that, to the best of
his knowledge, the numismatic material--
``(A) was acquired lawfully in one or more States
Party;
``(B) was lawfully exported from a State Party in
which the numismatic material was acquired;
``(C) is of a type known to exist in multiple
examples which has been published in a reference work
on numismatics; and
``(D) is not known to be the direct product of
illicit excavations within another State Party after
the effective date for import restrictions on
numismatic material granted to that State Party.''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(e) No Other Documentation Required.--The customs officer
reviewing the satisfactory evidence shall not require any documentation
or statements additional to that which is set forth in subsection (c)
unless the customs officer has probable cause based on documentary
evidence to believe that the satisfactory evidence is false or
fraudulent.''.
<all>