Bill Details
View committees (1)
View cosponsors (20)
- Rep. Casar, Greg [D-Texas-35]
- Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-District of Columbia]
- Rep. McGarvey, Morgan [D-Kentucky-3]
- Rep. Lee, Summer L. [D-Pennsylvania-12]
- Rep. García, Jesús G. "Chuy" [D-Illinois-4]
- Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-Illinois-9]
- Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-New York-20]
- Rep. Garcia, Robert [D-California-42]
- Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-Illinois-13]
- Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-Wisconsin-2]
- Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-Tennessee-9]
- Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-Georgia-6]
- Rep. McIver, LaMonica [D-New Jersey-10]
- Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-Washington-7]
- Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-Texas-37]
- Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-Illinois-7]
- Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-New York-14]
- Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-New York-10]
- Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-Florida-10]
- Rep. Chu, Judy [D-California-28]
AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.
This bill would change nutrition assistance rules so workers who go on strike, and the people who live with them, would not automatically lose access to food benefits because of the strike. In simple terms, it updates the law so a strike itself cannot be used to make a family ineligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The goal is to help keep food support in place while workers are taking part in a labor strike.
- It amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, which is the main law that governs SNAP.
- It removes a rule that can make striking workers ineligible for benefits and rewrites the language so being on strike does not trigger automatic SNAP loss.
- The change also protects the households of striking workers, not just the workers themselves.
- The bill is introduced as a way to prevent families from losing food assistance during a strike.
Official Summaries
Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025
This bill allows certain striking workers and their households to maintain their eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Specifically, the bill provides that a household that would otherwise be eligible to participate in SNAP is eligible for benefits if any member of the household is on strike because of a labor dispute. Current law generally prohibits a household from participating in SNAP if any member of the household is on strike unless the household was eligible for SNAP immediately prior to the strike. Also, under current law, households are not eligible for an increased SNAP allotment as a result of the decreased income of a striking member of the household. The bill expands SNAP eligibility for households with striking workers by repealing both of these restrictions.
The bill also allows a government employee who is dismissed for striking and their household to maintain SNAP program eligibility. Specifically, current law prohibits certain individuals who voluntarily and without good cause quit a job from participating in SNAP. Further, a federal, state, or local government employee who participates in a strike against the government that results in their dismissal is considered to have voluntarily quit without good cause. The bill eliminates the provision that considers the dismissed government employee to have voluntarily quit without good cause, thereby allowing the employee and their household to maintain SNAP program eligibility if they are otherwise eligible for the program.
Current Full Text
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2357 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2357
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to ensure that striking
workers and their households do not become ineligible for benefits
under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 26, 2025
Ms. Adams (for herself, Mr. Casar, Ms. Norton, Mr. McGarvey, Ms. Lee of
Pennsylvania, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Tonko, Mr.
Garcia of California, Ms. Budzinski, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Cohen, Mrs. McBath,
Mrs. McIver, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms.
Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Frost, Ms. Chu, Mr. Gomez,
Mr. Carson, Mr. Kennedy of New York, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Evans of
Pennsylvania, Mr. McGovern, Ms. McBride, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms.
Omar, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Brownley, Ms.
Pettersen, Ms. Waters, and Ms. Ansari) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to ensure that striking
workers and their households do not become ineligible for benefits
under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025''.
SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF STRIKING WORKERS.
Section 6(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C.
2015(d)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(D)--
(A) by striking clause (iv); and
(B) by redesignating clauses (v) and (vi) as
clauses (iv) and (v), respectively; and
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) by striking ``participate in the supplemental
nutrition assistance program at any time that'' and
inserting ``be ineligible to participate in the
supplemental nutrition assistance program as a result
of'';
(B) by striking ``is on strike'' and inserting
``being on strike''; and
(C) by striking ``: Provided, That'' and all that
follows through the period at the end and inserting a
period.
<all>