Bill Details

HR.1928 - 119th Congress

Track Sanctuary City Accountability Act? Stop tracking Sanctuary City Accountability Act?

When you track this bill you will receive emails when the bill has been updated.

You will no longer receive emails when this bill is updated.

Status
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. To President
  5. Law
Latest action
2025-03-06 - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced Date
2025-03-06
Policy Area
Immigration
Committees
View committees (1)
8
0

AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.

This bill would let U.S. citizens sue state or local governments that are considered “sanctuary jurisdictions” if a non-citizen located there commits a crime against them or an immediate family member. The person could ask a federal court for court orders or money damages. The bill says these lawsuits could also apply if the person later moves to another place. It also says local governments would not be responsible under this bill if they are only following state law.

  • It creates a new private right to sue in federal court for people harmed by a crime committed by a non-citizen who was in a sanctuary jurisdiction.
  • A “sanctuary jurisdiction” is defined as a state or local government that limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
  • Examples include refusing to honor immigration detainers, making it harder to honor detainers, blocking access for immigration interviews, or limiting communication with federal immigration officers.
  • Local governments would not be liable under this bill if the policy they are following comes from the state government.

Official Summaries

No summaries available

Current Full Text

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1928 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1928

  To authorize private enforcement of immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2025

 Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Gill of Texas, Mr. Crane, Mr. Gooden, Mr. 
Haridopolos, and Mr. Feenstra) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
  To authorize private enforcement of immigration laws, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctuary City Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    Title I of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 107. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    ``(a) In General.--Any individual who is a national of the United 
States may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the 
United States against a sanctuary jurisdiction in which an alien was 
located if that alien commits a crime against that individual, or an 
immediate family member of that individual, in the sanctuary 
jurisdiction, or in any other jurisdiction to which the alien later 
relocates, for such injunctive relief or compensatory damages as may be 
appropriate.
    ``(b) Limitation on Liability.--A unit of local government may not 
be held liable under this section for enforcing or implementing a law, 
ordinance, regulation, resolution, policy, or other practice imposed by 
the State in which the unit of local government is located.
    ``(c) Sanctuary Jurisdiction Defined.--In this section, the term 
`sanctuary jurisdiction' means any State or unit of local government 
that has laws, ordinances, regulations, resolutions, policies, or other 
practices that obstruct immigration enforcement and shield criminals 
from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including by--
            ``(1) refusing to or prohibiting agencies from complying 
        with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainers;
            ``(2) imposing unreasonable conditions on U.S. Immigration 
        and Customs Enforcement detainer compliance;
            ``(3) denying U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
        access to interview incarcerated aliens; or
            ``(4) otherwise impeding communication or information 
        exchanges between the jurisdiction's personnel and Federal 
        immigration officers.''.
                                 <all>