Bill Details

HR.1856 - 119th Congress

Track CASE LOAD Act of 2025? Stop tracking CASE LOAD Act of 2025?

When you track this bill you will receive emails when the bill has been updated.

You will no longer receive emails when this bill is updated.

Status
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. To President
  5. Law
Latest action
2025-03-05 - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced Date
2025-03-05
Policy Area
Law
Committees
View committees (1)
7
0

AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.

This bill would add more federal judges to help the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California handle a very heavy workload. The court covers a large area with 34 counties and serves about 8.4 million people, but it currently has only six permanent judges. Lawmakers say the court has too many cases for the number of judges it has now, and that the backlog is likely to get worse. To ease this pressure, the bill would create five new district judge seats over time and also provide money for the extra court space and equipment needed to support them.

  • On or after January 21, 2027, the President would appoint 2 new district judges for the Eastern District of California.
  • On or after January 5, 2029, the President would appoint 1 more district judge for that court.
  • On or after January 21, 2031, the President would appoint 2 additional district judges.
  • The bill also updates the federal judge-count table for California and allows federal funding for the needed offices and facilities.

Official Summaries

No summaries available

Current Full Text

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1856 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1856

To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the 
                    eastern district of California.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2025

  Mr. Costa (for himself and Mr. Obernolte) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To authorize additional district judges for the district court for the 
                    eastern district of California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Additional Seats to Ease 
Legally Overburdened Adjudicators' Dockets Act of 2025'' or the ``CASE 
LOAD Act of 2025''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Federal district court for the eastern district of 
        California is the Federal trial court for 34 counties, 
        including five of the fastest-growing cities in the State of 
        California, serving a population of approximately 8,400,000.
            (2) The Federal district court for the eastern district of 
        California is one of the largest judicial districts in the 
        country, with approximately 8,400,000 residents and over 87,000 
        square miles of land. Yet, there are only six permanent 
        judgeships, with one upcoming vacancy pending a nomination 
        elevating a sitting district judge.
            (3) Based on the 2019 U.S. census data, the ratio of 
        authorized district judgeships to population was 1:1,362,552. 
        The central district of California has the next highest ratio 
        in the State, nearly half the size, with 1:694,323.
            (4) As of June 2022, the total pending cases per judgeship 
        in the Federal district court for the eastern district of 
        California was 1,308, over 2.6 times larger than the average 
        for all districts within the United States Court of Appeals for 
        the Ninth Circuit. Pending caseloads remain high, and if a new 
        vacancy opens upon the elevation of the district judge, 
        caseloads will once again reach this unsustainable level.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 
              CALIFORNIA.

    (a) 2027.--
            (1) Additional judgeships.--On or after January 21, 2027, 
        the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 
        of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern 
        district of California.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table contained in section 
        133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
        the items relating to California and inserting the following:


  ``California:
  Northern.............................  14
  Eastern..............................  8
  Central..............................  27
  Southern.............................  13''.
 

            (3) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (2) 
        shall take effect on January 20, 2027.
    (b) 2029.--
            (1) Additional judgeships.--On or after January 5, 2029, 
        the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 
        of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the eastern 
        district of California.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table contained in section 
        133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
        the items relating to California and inserting the following:


  ``California:
  Northern.............................  14
  Eastern..............................  9
  Central..............................  27
  Southern.............................  13''.
 

            (3) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (2) 
        shall take effect on January 4, 2029.
    (c) 2031.--
            (1) Additional judgeships.--On or after January 21, 2031, 
        the President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 
        of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the eastern 
        district of California.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table contained in section 
        133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
        the items relating to California and inserting the following:


  ``California:
  Northern.............................  14
  Eastern..............................  11
  Central..............................  27
  Southern.............................  13''.
 

            (3) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (2) 
        shall take effect on January 20, 2031.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act and the amendments made by this Act, 
including such sums as may be necessary to provide appropriate space 
and facilities for the judicial positions created by this Act or an 
amendment made by this Act.
                                 <all>