Bill Details
View committees (2)
View cosponsors (12)
- Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D-California-18]
- Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-District of Columbia]
- Rep. Garcia, Robert [D-California-42]
- Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-Illinois-9]
- Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-Massachusetts-7]
- Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-New York-12]
- Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-California-43]
- Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-Alabama-7]
- Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-Michigan-3]
- Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-Washington-1]
- Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-California-25]
- Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-New Jersey-5]
AI Summary This summary was generated by AI from the bill text. AI can get information wrong.
This bill would change Social Security and related benefit rules so that some disabled adult children can marry without losing key benefits. Right now, marriage can affect eligibility for Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, and sometimes Medicaid. The bill would remove that marriage penalty for people who receive disability-based child benefits, treat certain married couples more fairly under federal rules, and protect access to health coverage in some states. It also says Congress believes these benefits should not depend on where a person lives or on technical rules that treat a couple as married in one setting but not another.
- It would remove a Social Security rule that requires a disabled adult child to be unmarried in order to qualify for certain benefits.
- It would change how marriage is recognized under federal benefit rules so that people who are considered married for Social Security would also be treated as married for Supplemental Security Income.
- It would stop one spouse’s income or resources from being counted against the other spouse when deciding eligibility and benefit amounts for a married person who gets disability-based child benefits, or for that person’s spouse.
- It would help protect Medicaid eligibility in states that use certain income rules, so a married disabled adult child, or that person’s spouse, could keep medical assistance if they would still qualify when treated as unmarried.
Official Summaries
Marriage Equality for Disabled Adults Act
This bill eliminates certain marriage-related criteria for individuals entitled to Social Security child’s benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Specifically, the bill removes the requirement that individuals receiving Social Security child’s benefits be unmarried. Those eligible for Social Security child’s benefits generally include the minor children of eligible or deceased workers and disabled adult children (the disabled adult children of such workers for whom the onset of disability occurred before age 22). Under current law, child beneficiaries generally lose their benefits upon marriage to an individual who is not also eligible for Social Security benefits.
With respect to SSI, the bill removes the requirement that couples who present themselves as married in their community be considered married for purposes of SSI eligibility. The bill also exempts SSI recipients who are disabled adult children, or who marry disabled adult children, from the general requirement that the income or resources of an SSI recipient’s spouse be considered in an eligibility determination.
Further, married disabled adult children and their spouses who would otherwise be eligible for Medicaid in a state if they were unmarried must remain eligible for Medicaid regardless of their marriage.
Current Full Text
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1389 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1389
To secure the rights and dignity of marriage for Disabled Adult
Children, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 14, 2025
Mr. Panetta (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Norton, Mr. Garcia of
California, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Pressley, and Mr. Nadler) introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and
Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To secure the rights and dignity of marriage for Disabled Adult
Children, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Marriage Equality for Disabled
Adults Act''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE RESTRICTION FOR DISABLED ADULT
CHILDREN.
(a) In General.--Section 202(d) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 402(d)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``was unmarried and'';
(2) by amending paragraph (1)(D) to read as follows:
``(D) the month in which such child dies;''; and
(3) by striking paragraph (5).
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 202(s)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C.
402(s)(2)) is amended by striking ``(d)(5),''.
SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF RULES TO DETERMINE MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS.
(a) In General.--Section 1614(d) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1382c(d)) is amended by striking ``except that'' and all that
follows through the end of the subsection and inserting ``except that
if two individuals have been determined to be married under section
216(h)(1) for purposes of title II they shall be considered (from and
after the date of such determination or the date of their application
for benefits under this title, whichever is later) to be married for
purposes of this title.''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Title XVI of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.) is amended--
(1) in section 1611(e)(3)--
(A) by striking ``a husband and wife'' each place
it appears and inserting ``two married individuals'';
and
(B) by striking ``such husband and wife'' and
inserting ``such married individuals'';
(2) in section 1614(b)--
(A) in the first sentence, by striking ``the
husband or wife of'' and inserting ``married to''; and
(B) in the second sentence, by striking ``husband
and wife'' and inserting ``married''; and
(3) in section 1631(b)(1)(A)(i), by striking ``husband or
wife'' and inserting ``spouse''.
SEC. 4. INCOME AND RESOURCE DEEMING RULES.
Section 1614(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(f)) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(5) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, for
purposes of determining eligibility for, and the amount of,
benefits for a married individual who is entitled to a child's
insurance benefit based on a disability under section 202(d),
or for the spouse of such an individual, the income and
resources of the one spouse is deemed to not include any income
or resources of the other spouse.''.
SEC. 5. RETENTION OF MEDICAID FOR CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS.
Section 1634 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1383(c)) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(e) In the case of a State that exercises the option under
section 1902(f), any individual who--
``(1) is a married individual who is entitled to a child's
insurance benefit based on a disability for any month under
section 202(d) or the spouse of such an individual; and
``(2) would be eligible for medical assistance under the
State plan approved under title XIX if the individual were
unmarried,
shall remain eligible for medical assistance under such plan for so
long as the individual satisfies the criteria described in paragraphs
(1) and (2).''.
SEC. 6. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of the United States Congress that--
(1) Disabled Adult Children, if married, should remain
eligible for all Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security
benefits under the same terms as they would if unmarried,
regardless of State of residence or State Medicaid law;
specifically, this legislation should not impact a Disabled
Adult Child's eligibility for any Medicaid services for which
they were eligible when unmarried;
(2) regardless of marital status, eligibility of Disabled
Adult Children to receive Federal Medicare, Medicaid, and
Social Security benefits should not be impacted by any
``holding out'' status as defined in section 1382c(d) of title
42, United States Code; and
(3) Disabled Adult Children's eligibility for Social
Security Disability Insurance benefits should not be
conditioned on geographic location or residency in the United
States.
<all>